BadPhorm - When good ISPs go bad! :: Forums :: Fight Back :: Phorm-Free ISPs
 
<< Previous thread | Next thread >>
List of Phorm infected / free ISPs?
Go to page       >>  
Moderators: Jim Murray, narcosis, felixcatuk, Sammy
Author Post
Bob
Wed Aug 13 2008, 04:40PM
Registered Member #522
Joined: Wed Aug 13 2008, 04:09PM
Posts: 5
I might be blind, but i just can't find such a list - I expect it to be sticky here, with the ISP names as links to threads dealing with that ISP.

Also the search facility doesn't allow <4 character phrases, so it's rather hard to search for sky, o2, Be, zen etc...

My current query is on the position of sky, as I'm looking to move from VM (yes I read that sticky)
Back to top
Midnight_Voice
Wed Aug 13 2008, 10:01PM
Registered Member #180
Joined: Thu Mar 13 2008, 08:51PM
Posts: 753
You might want to click on the little magnifying glass next to the word 'Search' and get a more versatile search dialogue.

But the Search is still broken :-(

My best shot was to Search for 'Phorm' with Must Contain 'Sky'

However, it seems to find a lot of postings that don't contain the word 'Sky'.

I also tried searching for 'Sky*', which finds words beginning with 'sky', but not the word 'sky ' itself.

Searching for 'Sky ' or 'Sky *' is no good, either.

Ho hum

[ Edited Wed Aug 13 2008, 10:18PM ]

I'm a nonconPhormist; I won't be conned by Phorm
Back to top
Mel
Wed Aug 13 2008, 11:30PM
Registered Member #137
Joined: Sat Mar 08 2008, 06:00PM
Posts: 322
I get the impression that Sky are waiting to see how the Phorming Three's customers react -

http://www.theregister.co.uk/2008/02/29/phorm_broadband_isp_targets/

Meanwhile a spokesman for Sky, the UK's fastest growing broadband network with about 1.2 million lines, said: "Sky is interested in exploring the potential for targeted online advertising and is talking with a number of companies operating in this area.

"Of paramount importance is the online safety of our customers and will only implement a solution when we can use customer data in a responsible way which safeguards privacy."


Which is why I didn't take them up on a very good deal to move my phone service to them.

[ Edited Wed Aug 13 2008, 11:30PM ]
Back to top
Cowherd
Thu Aug 14 2008, 08:17AM

Registered Member #352
Joined: Fri Apr 18 2008, 08:28AM
Posts: 164
SKY:
"Of paramount importance is the online safety of our customers and will only implement a solution when we can use customer data in a responsible way which safeguards privacy."

ISPs need to learn that they have no right to "use" customer's data in any way, ever.

It would be unacceptable for the Post Office to "use" the contents of mail I send/receive and unacceptable for a telephone operator to "use" the content of my telephone conversations, so why do ISPs think it OK to "use" my private Internet data?

Phorm, just say NO!
Back to top
felixcatuk
Thu Aug 14 2008, 09:44AM
felixcatuk


Registered Member #95
Joined: Wed Mar 05 2008, 12:03AM
Posts: 2584
Its a good idea.

I thought it might be helpful to have a voting mechanism to people discover the best and worst.

I could create a sticky thread with details of statements by each ISP who is a Phorm (or Nebuad etc) partner.

Let me discuss with Jim and the team.

[ Edited Thu Aug 14 2008, 09:46AM ]

Ready to leave BT? Call 0800 800 030 / 0800 328 6738, get your MAC code
Back to top
Bob
Fri Aug 15 2008, 10:18AM
Registered Member #522
Joined: Wed Aug 13 2008, 04:09PM
Posts: 5
Adding any statements the other way would be good as well.

Thanks
Back to top
Gordon
Fri Aug 15 2008, 10:41AM
Registered Member #287
Joined: Thu Apr 03 2008, 08:06PM
Posts: 358
Part of the problem is reading between the lines of cautious statements.

A statement that "we currently have no plans to use Phorm" from an ISP with a history of honesty, keeping its users informed, etc. could mean "Not as long as I'm in charge of this outfit, but I'd better stick the word "currently" in just to cover myself in case we get bought out in six months' time".

The same statement from an ISP with a habit of moving the goalposts could mean "We won't do anything about it until next month".
Back to top
Bob
Sat Aug 16 2008, 11:15AM
Registered Member #522
Joined: Wed Aug 13 2008, 04:09PM
Posts: 5
I've just an email from sky in response to the following:

What is the official position on the possibility of relationships between sky and phorm, or any similar organisation.


Dear [Bob],
Thank you for contacting Sky Broadband Technical Support.
Sky have no plans to associate themselves with organizations such as Phorm.

If you need further help or information, please reply to this email or contact us on 08442 41 05 15.

Kind regards
David

Sky Broadband Technical Support

Sky


[ Edited Sat Aug 16 2008, 11:17AM ]
Back to top
madslug
Sat Aug 16 2008, 09:28PM

Registered Member #266
Joined: Tue Apr 01 2008, 12:11PM
Posts: 771
I was thinking about the initial posts and realised that there is no list of ISPs available anywhere. Many ISPs are actually white label resellers of other ISPs, some selling one product from one ISP and another product from another ISP. Getting a phorm-feel for the original supplier of the internet connection could be useful, and then rank ISPs according to their supplier's stance on Phorm et al.

I do know that LLU supplied internet connections are 'different' from direct to BTW connections. By that I mean, some ISPs can only supply to lines which are under the control of BTW but others can connect to any type of connection whether LLU or cable - does that mean that they are resellers for these other suppliers too?

Who is tracking your surfing? iCab mobile browser with its privacy controls now available to iPhone and iPod from the App Store - turn images off for faster and beacon free surfing.
Back to top
Gordon
Sat Aug 16 2008, 10:53PM
Registered Member #287
Joined: Thu Apr 03 2008, 08:06PM
Posts: 358
"others can connect to any type of connection whether LLU or cable - does that mean that they are resellers for these other suppliers too?"

I don't know the ins and outs of responsibilities, but, while it may be a straight rebadged product in some cases, I wouldn't normally think of it quite like that, I'd see the LLU supplier as being more the equivalent of BT Wholesale than BT Retail.
For example, I remember reading about a year ago that your own ISP, Griffin, had started using Tiscali LLU - but I'd still regard it as a Griffin "product", very different to something like Post Office Broadband being a rebadged BT Retail offering.

Edit:
Found Griffin's own announcement (June 2007) about the Tiscali deal, which doubtless explains it better than my clumsy attempt:
http://www.griffin.com/news/TiscaliUKPartner.aspx

[ Edited Sat Aug 16 2008, 11:12PM ]
Back to top
Go to page       >>   

Jump:     Back to top

Syndicate this thread: rss 0.92 Syndicate this thread: rss 2.0 Syndicate this thread: RDF
Powered by e107 Forum System