BadPhorm - When good ISPs go bad! :: Forums :: Tips & Breaking News :: Media Sightings
 
<< Previous thread | Next thread >>
ICO survey
Go to page       >>  
Moderators: Jim Murray, narcosis, felixcatuk, Sammy
Author Post
PhormUKPRteam
Wed Mar 19 2008, 03:48PM
Registered Member #110
Joined: Thu Mar 06 2008, 05:05PM
Posts: 47
Hi all

Knowing how much you are following the ICO and Phorm at present, and at the risk of sounding like a broken record, today's ICO survey (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7304455.stm) on data protection highlights why the Phorm system is an improvement in online privacy.

We don't store any personally identifiable information so there is nothing to lose. We can't accidently reveal what we don't have unlike the ad targeting systems of other major Internet companies which retain identifiable personal data for over 12 months before it is even anonymised.
Back to top
andy2008
Wed Mar 19 2008, 03:56PM

Registered Member #217
Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 02:59PM
Posts: 24
lies lies and more lies. At least the likes of doubleclick dont need equipment inside the isp. Why do you need equipment inside the isp ? why is it that so far the people who have carried out privacy assesments arnt exactly reputable companies ? why bother offering anti phishing when so many web browsers already do this ? which forums are on your list for today ? oh and do you buy many CD's from amazon ? i can send you targeted ads on this if you like ? yes i know who you are :| it doesnt take a genius for someone to use google to track people so i can only imagine how easy it would be for someone using phorm to track individuals. Thats another thing you keep harping on about the free download tool etc. I seem to remember 121media doing a similar thing. Nasty piece of work it was too. Phorm does realise the UK privacy laws are tougher than US privacy laws for a reason right ?

[ Edited Wed Mar 19 2008, 04:02PM ]

"I thought what I'd do was, I'd pretend I was one of those deaf-mutes."
Back to top
BadPhormula
Wed Mar 19 2008, 04:02PM
Registered Member #188
Joined: Sun Mar 16 2008, 05:00PM
Posts: 21
PhormUKPRteam wrote ...

Hi all

Knowing how much you are following the ICO and Phorm at present, and at the risk of sounding like a broken record, today's ICO survey (http://news.bbc.co.uk/1/hi/business/7304455.stm) on data protection highlights why the Phorm system is an improvement in online privacy.

We don't store any personally identifiable information so there is nothing to lose. We can't accidently reveal what we don't have unlike the ad targeting systems of other major Internet companies which retain identifiable personal data for over 12 months before it is even anonymised.



Hi Spin-Guy

It seems like only yesterday (5 years ago) that you were working on your last PR campaign... "Hearts & Minds"

Happy Anniversary Phtony

Back to top
SqueakyWheel
Wed Mar 19 2008, 04:07PM
Registered Member #37
Joined: Wed Feb 27 2008, 03:58PM
Posts: 17
Good grief, here we go again. People have moved past the "no storing of personal information" on to the fact you *scan it all in the first place even if they opt-out!*. Get that part right and people might be willing to listen to you.
Back to top
jtech
Wed Mar 19 2008, 04:08PM
Registered Member #215
Joined: Tue Mar 18 2008, 12:22PM
Posts: 20
I see I see yes.. o yes.. better targeted ads, i see.. they can make me safer.. i see, it makes such sense now! thanks for clearing that up.

There can not be any improvement in any Phorm, I would start looking deep in the mirror and ask yourself, 'How will they pay me if they loose all thier capital?'

Jtech
Back to top
Oblonsky
Wed Mar 19 2008, 04:08PM
Registered Member #132
Joined: Sat Mar 08 2008, 10:59AM
Posts: 91
Here's a few straws for you to hand over to Phorm next time you see them...
Back to top
Midnight_Voice
Wed Mar 19 2008, 05:00PM
Registered Member #180
Joined: Thu Mar 13 2008, 08:51PM
Posts: 41
Dear UKMisinPhormation team: It seems to me that the data Phorm wants to store about us, however anonymised, profiled, minimalised and channelled, is all additional to the information that is already being collected about us on the Internet.

And that it will in no way reduce one iota of that information.

So tell me, how will adding your sandgrains to the pile improve anything? All it does is to add many more points of failure and potential leakage.

(And no, I don't like a lot of the other collection techniques out there, either. But at least they are not trying to crawl under the duvet with me at night so they can even bottle my botty burps).

Big Brother: a programme people watch, or a program watching people?
Back to top
davidg
Wed Mar 19 2008, 05:01PM
Registered Member #135
Joined: Sat Mar 08 2008, 04:47PM
Posts: 13
Bull***t (Although why I keep arguing with a technically illiterate PR Company I really don't know - it's like pushing beer uphill).

Nothing to lose ? Go tell that to Mrs Thelma Arnold of Gwinnett County Georgia.
http://www.securityfocus.com/brief/277


[ Edited Wed Mar 19 2008, 05:20PM ]
Back to top
Sammy
Wed Mar 19 2008, 05:06PM

Registered Member #143
Joined: Sun Mar 09 2008, 08:36PM
Posts: 191
PhormUKPRteam wrote ...

Hi all

Knowing how much you are following the ICO and Phorm at present, and at the risk of sounding like a broken record.......


If you have a broken record - change it... Try answering some questions and REALLY addressing issues.

--
Protect your Privacy; Stop Phorm
Petition Government to Stop Phorm | Stop Phorm on Bebo

Win a 12 Month Modelling Contract
Back to top
TheOtherSteve
Wed Mar 19 2008, 05:28PM
Registered Member #178
Joined: Thu Mar 13 2008, 03:55PM
Posts: 46
Hello Citigate Dewe Rogerson sock puppets.

In case you didn't catch this elsewhere :

I don't care if Phorm's CEO gives me his first born son to hold in escrow as a guarantee of his promises.

I don't care if my ISP offers a water tight privacy contract signed in the blood of their customer service department who are consistently ignoring my complaints.

I don't care if they get the resurrected spirit of Jesus Christ to audit the source code.

I don't care if the God of the Old Testament manifests and writes "Hey guys, Phorm is OK by me" in letters of fire upon the sky.

I will not tolerate my ISP intercepting my communications in order to treat me as a chattel. Period.

I do not want Kent Spunkbubble and his merry band of cold warriors and root kit artists installing equipment anywhere in the UK telecomms network, for any purpose, ever. Period.

In other words, F*ck off, you shady b**tards.

It's illegal, it's immoral and since it clearly involves you lot sat behind your desks 24/7 crawling the web with your mouse hand poised above the 'paste' button, I sincerely hope it is making you fat.
Back to top
Go to page       >>   

Jump:     Back to top

Syndicate this thread: rss 0.92 Syndicate this thread: rss 2.0 Syndicate this thread: RDF
Powered by e107 Forum System