BadPhorm - When good ISPs go bad! :: Forums :: Phorm Discussion :: Tech Talk |
|
<< Previous thread | Next thread >> |
New Release: Dephormation 4.2 |
Moderators: Jim Murray, narcosis, felixcatuk, Sammy, revrob
|
Author | Post | ||
felixcatuk |
| ||
felixcatuk![]() ![]() ![]() Registered Member #95 Joined: Wed Mar 05 2008, 12:03AMPosts: 2597 | A new release of Dephormation browser add on with compliments; Dephormation 4.2 Release notes Important; before using the Flash LSO feature, please read the latest release notes carefully for configuration instructions. Note that Flash LSO regeneration may conflict with other add ons like 'Better Privacy' (which will detect and report LSOs being generated and/or erase the path to the LSOs when the browser is shutdown). This version adds compatibility with FF8, better code quality, a reset to defaults feature, and more robust Dephormed cookie setting/deleting. | ||
Back to top | | ||
Gordon |
| ||
![]() Registered Member #287 Joined: Thu Apr 03 2008, 09:06PMPosts: 383 | Thanks - I'll have a play with that later. :) On the subject of the wretched LSOs... This will doubtless depend on what sites you use, but I am unable to find any that I use which misbehave if you tell them what to do with their nasty little vermin. So, as an experiment, I tried what seems to me to be a ridiculously simple solution - I'm sure that with my lack of proper understanding I must be overlooking something - and that was to just change the permissions to make /home/user/.macromedia "Read only". Doesn't seem to have done any harm, the PC hasn't exploded, the polar ice cap hasn't totally disappeared, and I do not accept responsibility for earthquakes in Turkey (they've happened because my Turkish neighbours popped home for a holiday) - and it seems to do the job. Can you see anything wrong with the idea? | ||
Back to top | | ||
revrob |
| ||
![]() ![]() Registered Member #372 Joined: Wed Apr 23 2008, 04:09PMPosts: 581 | news videos and iPlayer on BBC site can fail without the ability to set LSOs - which the BBC said was a "temporary" technical measure about a year or more ago. | ||
Back to top | | ||
Gordon |
| ||
![]() Registered Member #287 Joined: Thu Apr 03 2008, 09:06PMPosts: 383 | Ah - that would probably rule it out for most people then. Personally I don't watch them, I just pop in and *read* the news (and I hate anything that moves while I'm reading, I find it an irritating distraction, so don't even allow the scripts that make the automatically changing pictures run), but I suspect that I'm very much in the minority there. Most people seem to have some kind of sound system on the PC (I don't - my CD burner is puzzled by this and throws up a warning every time I decide to commit umpteen pages of saved parish registers, old newspapers, whatever, to CD to free up some space - could do with a bigger hard drive really) and I imagine that, even if it's only once in a while, they will make use of the video stuff from the BBC. (Edited for dodgy English) [ Edited Tue Nov 15 2011, 08:42PM ] | ||
Back to top | | ||
lardycake |
| ||
![]() Registered Member #141 Joined: Sun Mar 09 2008, 06:17PMPosts: 186 | Just to be pedantic, I think the BBC must also try to read back what they have set in the LSOs before allowing the video content to play. I say this because (using linux) I have ~/.macromedia symlinked to /dev/null which will just disregard anything written there while returning a success result to whatever tried to write there (ie it will appear to be writeable!). Thus I conclude the code must also try to read back what it thinks it has written before it will show the video content. I don't remember that the BBC ever provided an explanation of what they were storing other than it was "technical" and temporary while they converted to a new version of software. | ||
Back to top | | ||
Gordon |
| ||
![]() Registered Member #287 Joined: Thu Apr 03 2008, 09:06PMPosts: 383 | Well, while my own easy solution may suit me, I'd reckon yours is a better bet for 99.99% of the population. Just out of interest, I popped into the BBC site, unblocked everything under the sun, and tried to persuade a video or two to function. Definitely no go - I just get a little whirly circle in either yellow or red that goes on forever, so "temporary", a nice elastic term, probably means "until we get conned into buying some other whizzo bit of software from the next bunch of wide boys (oops, sorry, that should read "entrepreneurs") who corner us in the pub". (Edited for typo - my typing gets worse every day!) [ Edited Thu Nov 17 2011, 01:17AM ] | ||
Back to top | | ||
revrob |
| ||
![]() ![]() Registered Member #372 Joined: Wed Apr 23 2008, 04:09PMPosts: 581 | I've found that a compromise is to use Firefox Addon, BetterPrivacy to ensure that whatever LSO gets set, can be easily deleted whenever I choose, and that ALL of them get zapped whenever I close the browser. If I'm on a site I don't trust very much I will use BP to zap the LSOs when I close that tab. I do use the iPlayer and BBC News videos to catch up with new items - my work hours tend to be a bit antisocial for live TV viewing. | ||
Back to top | | ||
lardycake |
| ||
![]() Registered Member #141 Joined: Sun Mar 09 2008, 06:17PMPosts: 186 | Gordon wrote ... ... I'd reckon yours is a better bet for 99.99% of the population. ... AFAIK you can only do this (redirect to /dev/null via a symlink) on unix like OS (that might include Apple OSX - I don't know) so that probably excludes over 90% of the population. I no longer visit the BBC website though I do occasionally use "get_iplayer" to download programs I've missed. "get_iplayer" seems to work quite happlily without needing LSOs. if interested see: http://www.infradead.org/get_iplayer/html/get_iplayer.html | ||
Back to top | | ||
Gordon |
| ||
![]() Registered Member #287 Joined: Thu Apr 03 2008, 09:06PMPosts: 383 | Ah, yes, I tend to overlook the existence of that "alternative" OS these days unless I want to use my old A3 scanner, when the W98SE box gets resurrected. I remember from earlier discussions that you have some handy scripts to solve the problem for them though - I pointed a couple of friends in the direction of your instructions ages ago, and they haven't asked for their money back. Personally, I have no interest in the genuine video side of things at all - I'm a grump who hates the way the internet is being turned into an extension of the TV and the like - but a number of sites I use are using Flash for things that don't need it, just to be trendy. There is, for example, a well-known religious organisation who settled in Salt Lake City, Utah, because there was nothing in the place name with more than four letters, and they thought their members should be able to cope with that. Although responsible for such garbage as the "IGI" (officially, the International Genealogical Index, unofficially, the Imaginary Grandparents Index, about 50% twaddle submitted by their clueless members) their site is worth visiting because they do have a large collection of genuine stuff too - scans of parish registers and other useful things (I found images of the Rhodesian death records for one of my wanderers in their stuff), and they use Flash (quite unnecessarily) for that section of the site. They are not the only ones - it's a disease that's spreading, and being too hard line about it, saying "I'm not having that junk installed on my PC" results in being unable to use a fair amount of useful stuff, so I've reluctantly learned to live with it. | ||
Back to top | | ||
Gordon |
| ||
![]() Registered Member #287 Joined: Thu Apr 03 2008, 09:06PMPosts: 383 | "they use Flash (quite unnecessarily) for that section of the site." Wouldn't you know it? I've just popped in there for the first time in ages, and they've changed the viewer they use. I'm not sure what the new one's actually doing, it still looks rather like the average Flash thing, but Flash it isn't - as long as I allow scripts, it works straight off. Unfortunately, there are still about half a dozen other sites scattered around the globe which use it and which I keep an eye on as stuff gets added, as my lot got bored with places like Hackney and Sowerby Bridge, so (as well as the usual emigrants to the colonies and the USA) I find them turning up in Turkey (having married in Argentina, with a daughter born in Costa Rica), Jordan, Palestine, China, New Guinea, the Gold Coast - you name it, my lot have polluted it! | ||
Back to top | | ||