| BadPhorm - When good ISPs go bad! :: Forums :: Site News :: Site Discussion |  | << Previous thread | Next thread >> | 
| New User Registration | ||
| 
	Moderators: Jim Murray, narcosis, felixcatuk, Sammy, revrob
	 | 
| Author | Post | ||
| Jim Murray | 
 | ||
|   Registered Member #1Joined: Thu Feb 21 2008, 08:29PM Posts: 349 | I'm sure we've all seen the pile of spam that had managed to find it's way onto the site despite the best efforts of the both the Admin team and the site software. What wasn't obvious is just how bad the problem has become - well, it wasn't obvious until I switched to manually approving all registrations. Since I did that NOT ONE valid user signup has been made, but over 500 attempts to sign up by spambots have been rejected. Given that, I am seriously considering closing new user registrations for BadPhorm. Open user registration is not working & manually approving users in the face of that volume of bot activity isn't really a long-term solution. So, the question for everyone is - what's the way forward. Options I'm considering are : 
 I'll let this site for a couple of weeks, if there's no consensus after that then I'm afraid I'll just need to pick one!! Thanks, Jim. | ||
| Back to top |  | ||
| revrob | 
 | ||
|   Registered Member #372Joined: Wed Apr 23 2008, 04:09PM Posts: 581 | I'd go for the manual email method for registration. Using a gif image of the email address without a mailto: link attached, and - for those using screen readers - a text version in "user at domain dot com" format so that screen readers can get the information too. that ought to keep your inbox empty and allow anyone who wants to join to do so. People joining a site like this are usually fairly well motivated and will be happy to do the manual registration. | ||
| Back to top |  | ||
| madslug | 
 | ||
|   Registered Member #266Joined: Tue Apr 01 2008, 01:11PM Posts: 808 | I agree with the email method (even though I have not posted here for a long time so maybe my vote should not count for so much). For years I have encoded email addresses in &# format and it is rare for a spam bot to harvest the address. This keeps the address human and screen reader accessible, and clickable. All the bots get when they try to follow is a URL beginning with & which returns a 404 error. | ||
| Back to top |  | ||
| lardycake | 
 | ||
|  Registered Member #141Joined: Sun Mar 09 2008, 06:17PM Posts: 186 | Another vote for the email method | ||
| Back to top |  | ||
| PingusPeriratus | 
 | ||
|  Registered Member #657Joined: Fri May 01 2009, 06:32PM Posts: 814 | sounds good to me. | ||
| Back to top |  | ||
| Gordon | 
 | ||
|  Registered Member #287Joined: Thu Apr 03 2008, 09:06PM Posts: 383 | I like the manual e-mail idea too - I use it myself on one site, encoded as per madslug's system, and that specific e-mail address is not used for anything else. Admittedly that site itself is fairly "hidden" nowadays anyway (Google bots etc. got told to get lost about seven years ago) but I have had less than half a dozen dud contacts on that address in nearly ten years. | ||
| Back to top |  | ||
| Midnight Caller | 
 | ||
|   Registered Member #483Joined: Wed Jul 16 2008, 03:27PM Posts: 3 | Another vote for the email method | ||
| Back to top |  | ||
| Jim Murray | 
 | ||
|   Registered Member #1Joined: Thu Feb 21 2008, 08:29PM Posts: 349 | Thanks guys... new user registration has been disabled and a message asking new users to e-mail [email protected] has been added to the front page. | ||
| Back to top |  | ||