Forums
| BadPhorm - When good ISPs go bad! :: Forums :: Phorm Discussion :: Phorm Past and Present |
|
<< Previous thread | Next thread >> |
| Phorm Ownership. | ||
|
Moderators: Jim Murray, narcosis, felixcatuk, Sammy, revrob
|
| Author | Post | ||
| felixcatuk |
| ||
felixcatuk   Registered Member #95 Joined: Wed Mar 05 2008, 12:03AMPosts: 2593 | We usually keep investment/finance data off badphorm, as a rule. But there is currently something very odd & worth recording about their current ownership details. Recap... the scores on the doors used to be... As of 7 March, 2011, so far as the Company is aware, the following shareholdings hold 3% or more of the common share capital of the Company: Kent Ertugrul 14.0% Blackrock Investment Management 13.2% Standard Life 4.6% Amundi Asset Management 4.3% Charles Stanley 4.3% Goldman Sachs Managed Funds 3.7% Gestrust SA 3.4% Jarvis Investment Management 3.2% Fast forward to today, after the rights issue, placing, and loan repayments... the issue of tens of millions of shares, the scores on the doors are now... As of 11 November, 2011, so far as the Company is aware, the following shareholdings hold 3% or more of the common share capital of the Company: Which seems a bit, surprising.Kent Ertugrul 14.0% [NO CHANGE] Blackrock Investment Management 13.2% [NO CHANGE] Standard Life 4.6% [NO CHANGE] Amundi Asset Management 4.3% [NO CHANGE] Charles Stanley 4.3% [NO CHANGE] Goldman Sachs Managed Funds 3.7% [NO CHANGE] Gestrust SA 3.4% [NO CHANGE] Jarvis Investment Management 3.2% [NO CHANGE] | ||
| Back to top | | ||
| Gordon |
| ||
 Registered Member #287 Joined: Thu Apr 03 2008, 09:06PMPosts: 379 | I confess that the intricacies of the world of high-as-a-kite finance baffle me (I don't even have Open Orifice Blonde Edition, just a note book with two columns, "In" and "Out"), but even to my mathematically challenged mind, it does seem highly unlikely that *all* of the companies involved would have bought *exactly* the same percentage of the new shares as they already held of the old ones. I got totally lost trying to keep track of that side of it on iii - but I wonder if we have some piggey-jokery with the different versions of "the company"? Was the result of all the playing around maybe that "Phorm UK" (or whatever), as opposed to "Phorm Inc" (or whatever) was unchanged in it's total shares amount because of things like worthless loan notes being switched to the other side of the business? [ Edited Tue Nov 15 2011, 01:16AM ] | ||
| Back to top | | ||
Powered by e107 Forum System