<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
				<!-- generator="e107" -->
				<!-- content type="Forum Posts" -->
				<rss  version="2.0">
				<channel>
				<title>BadPhorm - When good ISPs go bad! : Forum Posts</title>
				<link>/</link>
				<description></description>

<language>en-gb</language>
				<copyright>This site is powered by <a href="http://e107.org/" rel="external">e107</a>, which is released under the terms of the <a href="http://www.gnu.org/" rel="external">GNU</a> GPL License.The contents of this site, and communications between this site and its users, are protected by database right, copyright, confidentiality and the right not to be intercepted conferred by section 1(3) of the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000.  The use of those contents and communications by Internet Service Providers or others to profile or classify users of this site for advertising or other purposes is strictly forbidden.</copyright>
				<managingEditor>admin@nospam.com (Jim Murray)</managingEditor>
				<webMaster>admin@nospam.com (Jim Murray)</webMaster>
				<pubDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:57:11 +0000</pubDate>
				<lastBuildDate>Mon, 06 Sep 2010 10:57:11 +0000</lastBuildDate>
				<docs>http://backend.userland.com/rss</docs>
				<generator>e107 (http://e107.org)</generator>
				<ttl>60</ttl>
					
						<item>
						<title>Re: Ofcom Draft Initial Obligations Code</title>
<link>http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13772</link>
<description><![CDATA[[html] Ofcom again eh?  Very good at protecting THEIR privacy. [/html]]]></description>
<author>phillipmain@nospam.com (PingusPeriratus)</author>
<pubDate>Sat, 04 Sep 2010 07:51:53 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13772</guid>
</item>
						<item>
						<title>Re: Ofcom Draft Initial Obligations Code</title>
<link>http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13772</link>
<description><![CDATA[Snap - I had an identical Vaizey Letter via my MP (Mark Hunter), it even had the same date.]]></description>
<author>clw.thewests@nospam.com (lardycake)</author>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 23:24:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13772</guid>
</item>
						<item>
						<title>Re: Freedom of Information Requests sent in</title>
<link>http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?10673</link>
<description><![CDATA[[html]<br /><h2>Phillip Main<br /><br />2 September 2010</h2><div class="correspondence_text">Dear FOI Responses,<br /><br />Thank you for your reply. It is now very very clear that the<br />government does NOT want to answer for it's involvement in this<br />disgraceful episode.<br /><br />Vexatious request AGAIN. Have you ever thought that if you actually<br />answered one of these requests honestly that the rest would stop?<br /><br />Vexatious my rear end. This is purely and simply the governments<br />embarrassment at getting caught giving a nod and a wink to<br />something they knew was dubious from the start, and its attempts to<br />cover its own rear end when the faeces hit the fan.<br /><br />This is a mockery of the ideals of the Freedom of Information Act.<br />Either the government knew that Russian sourced interception<br />equipment was placed in the centre of the national communication<br />infrastructure, and was complicit. Or, BT and Phorm pulled the wool<br />over officials and Ministers eyes,in which case it is incompetence<br />of the highest order. It is one of the two scenarios and I cannot<br />make my mind up which is worse.<br /><br />Yours sincerely,<br /><br />Phillip Main</div><!-- Can use this to get name of who followup was too, if say you                  play with proper from display, but not sure needed                              Follow up sent to: FOI Responses                            --> [/html]]]></description>
<author>phillipmain@nospam.com (PingusPeriratus)</author>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 16:47:24 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?10673</guid>
</item>
						<item>
						<title>Re: Ofcom Draft Initial Obligations Code</title>
<link>http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13772</link>
<description><![CDATA[[html] <img src="http://pingusperiratus.pwp.blueyonder.co.uk/files/ofcommp.jpg" alt="ofcom reply" /> [/html]]]></description>
<author>phillipmain@nospam.com (PingusPeriratus)</author>
<pubDate>Fri, 03 Sep 2010 14:51:28 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13772</guid>
</item>
						<item>
						<title>Re: Freedom of Information Requests sent in</title>
<link>http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?10673</link>
<description><![CDATA[[html]<br /><h1>2005 Correspondence between Home Office and BERR/DBIS concerning 121Media/Phorm</h1><a href="http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/2005_correspondence_between_home_2#outgoing-82511">http://www.whatdotheyknow.com/request/2005_correspondence_between_home_2#outgoing-82511</a><br /><br /><br /><br />I write in response to your Freedom of Information Act request of 31 August <br />2010 relating to 121media and Phorm. <br />We have considered your request and we consider it to be vexatious when <br />considered in conjunction with the previous requests you have submitted on <br />this topic.  Section 14(1) of the Act provides that the Home Office is not <br />obliged to comply with a request for information of this nature if it is <br />considered as vexatious.   <br /><br />We have decided that these requests are vexatious because, in our view, it <br />meets with the criteria laid out by the Information Commissioner’s Office. A <br />copy of this guidance can be found here – <br /><br /><br />Well another one down. Someone really does not want this can of worms to open.  If there was nothing going on in 2005 why not just say so?<br /><br />Phorm,openess,acountability,honesty,all words missing from the government dictionary.<br /><br />Pingus<br />[/html]]]></description>
<author>phillipmain@nospam.com (PingusPeriratus)</author>
<pubDate>Thu, 02 Sep 2010 12:34:43 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?10673</guid>
</item>
						<item>
						<title>Re: cabinet office advice</title>
<link>http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13800</link>
<description><![CDATA[[html] <a href="http://bit.ly/dpaL8l">http://bit.ly/dpaL8l</a><br />BT/PHORM [/html]]]></description>
<author>phillipmain@nospam.com (PingusPeriratus)</author>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 15:22:07 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13800</guid>
</item>
						<item>
						<title>Re: cabinet office advice</title>
<link>http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13800</link>
<description><![CDATA[[html] <a href="http://bit.ly/9IVVjt">http://bit.ly/9IVVjt</a> [/html]]]></description>
<author>phillipmain@nospam.com (PingusPeriratus)</author>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:38:11 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13800</guid>
</item>
						<item>
						<title>Re: cabinet office advice</title>
<link>http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13800</link>
<description><![CDATA[[html] <a href="http://bit.ly/d6IfsD">http://bit.ly/d6IfsD</a> [/html]]]></description>
<author>phillipmain@nospam.com (PingusPeriratus)</author>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 13:33:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13800</guid>
</item>
						<item>
						<title>Re: cabinet office advice</title>
<link>http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13800</link>
<description><![CDATA[[html] <span style="font-size: x-small;">ico</span><span style="font-size: x-small;"><br /></span><a href="http://bit.ly/dc92Na">http://bit.ly/dc92Na</a><br />hOMEOFFICE<br /><a href="http://bit.ly/cARBn1">http://bit.ly/cARBn1</a> [/html]]]></description>
<author>phillipmain@nospam.com (PingusPeriratus)</author>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 08:13:49 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13800</guid>
</item>
						<item>
						<title>Re: Reg: Euro bell tolls for UK's data protection regs</title>
<link>http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13802</link>
<description><![CDATA[Only a kicking?   Oh they deserve so much more, let's give it to them.<br />]]></description>
<author>phillipmain@nospam.com (PingusPeriratus)</author>
<pubDate>Tue, 31 Aug 2010 07:55:02 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13802</guid>
</item>
						<item>
						<title>Re: cabinet office advice</title>
<link>http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13800</link>
<description><![CDATA[You could do something similar for the Home Office. Or ICO. :)]]></description>
<author>felixcatukpublic@nospam.com (felixcatuk)</author>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 22:06:56 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13800</guid>
</item>
						<item>
						<title>Re: Ertugrul one liners</title>
<link>http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13791</link>
<description><![CDATA[A personal favourite is the "It'll most definitely be online by the end of the year" closely followed by "It is not a great surprise to us, to be honest" when it wasn't.<br /><br />Or telling Sir TBL he was 'speaking from a position of ignorance' about the way the internet works. That was the moment the final shreds of credibility finally perished.<br /><br />So many to pick from. Its hard to choose.<br />]]></description>
<author>felixcatukpublic@nospam.com (felixcatuk)</author>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:40:50 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13791</guid>
</item>
						<item>
						<title>Reg: Euro bell tolls for UK's data protection regs</title>
<link>http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13802</link>
<description><![CDATA[[html]<br /><h2><a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/08/27/data_deadline_passes/" rel="external">Euro bell tolls for UK's data protection regs</a></h2><blockquote>In June the Commission <a href="http://www.theregister.co.uk/2010/06/25/uk_data_protect/" target="_blank">gave the UK government</a> two months to strengthen protection for its citizens or go to the European Court.</blockquote><blockquote>The Ministry of Justice said today it had responded but it would be inappropriate to discuss it while negotiations were going on.</blockquote>'Inappropriate'? Rather than 'Embarrassing'?<br /><br />Hopefully they will finally get the kicking they so richly deserve. [/html]]]></description>
<author>felixcatukpublic@nospam.com (felixcatuk)</author>
<pubDate>Mon, 30 Aug 2010 21:36:12 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13802</guid>
</item>
						<item>
						<title>Re: cabinet office advice</title>
<link>http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13800</link>
<description><![CDATA[[html] <a href="http://bit.ly/cZBZsK">http://bit.ly/cZBZsK</a> [/html]]]></description>
<author>phillipmain@nospam.com (PingusPeriratus)</author>
<pubDate>Fri, 27 Aug 2010 16:17:22 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13800</guid>
</item>
						<item>
						<title>cabinet office advice</title>
<link>http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13800</link>
<description><![CDATA[[html] <a href="http://bit.ly/ae6TEG">http://bit.ly/ae6TEG</a><br /><br /><a href="http://bit.ly/aMhLkj">http://bit.ly/aMhLkj </a> [/html]]]></description>
<author>phillipmain@nospam.com (PingusPeriratus)</author>
<pubDate>Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:55:32 +0000</pubDate>
<guid isPermaLink="true">http://www.badphorm.co.uk/e107_plugins/forum/forum_viewtopic.php?13800</guid>
</item>
				</channel>
				</rss>